Tsujii 2005

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   16  0.8831  0.0016  0.0812  0.3816  0.3319  0.35
Ax 1995   57  0.7548  0.0053  0.0361  0.0339  0.0664  0.04
Bacha 1998   46  0.8027  0.0039  0.0634  0.0630  0.2544  0.12
Barbosa 1983   60  0.7366  0.0054  0.0452  0.0438  0.0759  0.05
BenOr 1989   10  0.898  0.028  0.129  0.404  0.626  0.50
Biret 1990   5  0.906  0.036  0.102  0.5412  0.504  0.52
Brailowsky 1960   43  0.8156  0.0055  0.0459  0.0432  0.1453  0.07
Chiu 1999   45  0.8117  0.0152  0.0457  0.0432  0.1054  0.06
Clidat 1994   48  0.8029  0.0041  0.0542  0.0519  0.4038  0.14
Cohen 1997   63  0.7044  0.0060  0.0364  0.0311  0.4646  0.12
Cortot 1951   47  0.8043  0.0042  0.0454  0.045  0.4542  0.13
Csalog 1996   27  0.8637  0.0035  0.0637  0.0616  0.3733  0.15
Czerny 1989   53  0.7846  0.0047  0.0450  0.0424  0.2847  0.11
Ezaki 2006   42  0.8261  0.0061  0.0460  0.0427  0.1651  0.08
Falvay 1989   12  0.8912  0.0118  0.0618  0.3217  0.3420  0.33
Fiorentino 1962   2  0.922  0.093  0.175  0.462  0.632  0.54
Fliere 1977   13  0.8964  0.0031  0.0533  0.1028  0.1936  0.14
Fou 1978   52  0.7858  0.0023  0.0726  0.1823  0.2528  0.21
Francois 1956   55  0.7630  0.0064  0.0544  0.0530  0.1452  0.08
Goldenweiser 1946   56  0.7557  0.0037  0.0540  0.0514  0.3541  0.13
Gornostaeva 1994   34  0.8426  0.0138  0.0635  0.0614  0.3834  0.15
Groot 1988   4  0.9125  0.015  0.1017  0.3429  0.2223  0.27
Hatto 1993   36  0.8434  0.0049  0.0546  0.0541  0.0662  0.05
Hatto 1997   40  0.8322  0.0146  0.0448  0.0438  0.0760  0.05
Horszowski 1983   59  0.7459  0.0040  0.0639  0.0620  0.1748  0.10
Indjic 2001   38  0.8336  0.0048  0.0451  0.0436  0.0761  0.05
Katin 1996   17  0.8821  0.0130  0.0528  0.1427  0.1932  0.16
Kiepura 1999   64  0.7067  0.0059  0.0363  0.0326  0.2549  0.09
Korecka 1992   49  0.8024  0.0145  0.0547  0.0535  0.0856  0.06
Kushner 1990   44  0.8113  0.0111  0.1215  0.372  0.597  0.47
Lilamand 2001   61  0.7118  0.0158  0.0458  0.0419  0.3845  0.12
Luisada 1990   15  0.8914  0.012  0.193  0.5310  0.475  0.50
Luisada 2008   26  0.8635  0.0024  0.0821  0.2722  0.2524  0.26
Lushtak 2004   6  0.904  0.037  0.108  0.417  0.559  0.47
Malcuzynski 1951   62  0.7038  0.0033  0.0632  0.1120  0.2135  0.15
Malcuzynski 1961   54  0.7739  0.0025  0.0825  0.1931  0.1330  0.16
Magaloff 1977   8  0.8923  0.0126  0.0824  0.237  0.4521  0.32
Magin 1975   35  0.8445  0.0043  0.0638  0.0638  0.0655  0.06
Meguri 1997   29  0.8547  0.0029  0.0631  0.126  0.5026  0.24
Milkina 1970   41  0.8351  0.0051  0.0453  0.0438  0.0658  0.05
Mohovich 1999   24  0.875  0.0317  0.0722  0.2510  0.5317  0.36
Nezu 2005   39  0.8310  0.0228  0.0630  0.1415  0.4027  0.24
Ohlsson 1999   25  0.869  0.0232  0.0629  0.1429  0.2029  0.17
Olejniczak 1990   3  0.9111  0.014  0.1011  0.397  0.4910  0.44
Osinska 1989   20  0.873  0.0412  0.0910  0.4010  0.3613  0.38
Perlemuter 1992   33  0.8440  0.0057  0.0636  0.0615  0.2543  0.12
Poblocka 1999   9  0.8955  0.0022  0.0816  0.3613  0.3715  0.36
Rangell 2001   22  0.8715  0.0127  0.0727  0.171  0.6122  0.32
Richter 1960   37  0.847  0.0256  0.0449  0.0425  0.2250  0.09
Richter 1961   58  0.7562  0.0063  0.0455  0.0440  0.0757  0.05
Rosen 1989   18  0.8842  0.0021  0.0920  0.307  0.4416  0.36
Rubinstein 1939   23  0.8754  0.0013  0.0814  0.378  0.5011  0.43
Rubinstein 1952   30  0.8552  0.009  0.0913  0.3710  0.3618  0.36
Rubinstein 1966   7  0.9032  0.0010  0.104  0.4811  0.3912  0.43
Rudanovskaya 2007   31  0.8541  0.0050  0.0456  0.047  0.5239  0.14
Shebanova 2002   14  0.8920  0.0114  0.086  0.438  0.528  0.47
Smith 1975   19  0.8850  0.0034  0.0543  0.0510  0.3737  0.14
Sztompka 1959   51  0.8053  0.0062  0.0365  0.0351  0.0563  0.04
Tanyel 1992   11  0.8919  0.0115  0.087  0.421  0.663  0.53
Tsujii 2005   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Uninsky 1959   21  0.8733  0.0020  0.0719  0.3113  0.4514  0.37
Vardi 1988   50  0.8016  0.0144  0.0541  0.056  0.4931  0.16
Wasowski 1980   32  0.8449  0.0019  0.0623  0.2523  0.2325  0.24
Zimerman 1975   28  0.8628  0.0036  0.0545  0.0511  0.3840  0.14
Average   1  0.951  0.481  0.481  0.7110  0.511  0.60
Random 1   67  -0.1463  0.0066  0.0266  0.0258  0.0367  0.02
Random 2   66  0.0265  0.0067  0.0167  0.0149  0.0466  0.02
Random 3   65  0.1160  0.0065  0.0362  0.0344  0.0465  0.03
Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).