Shebanova 2002

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		17	0.85	63	0.00	18	0.14	16	0.40	25	0.20	22	0.28
Ax 1995		60	0.67	57	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	62	0.03	66	0.03
Bacha 1998		39	0.80	19	0.01	19	0.09	26	0.18	34	0.11	33	0.14
Barbosa 1983		46	0.78	26	0.00	32	0.05	31	0.12	13	0.48	24	0.24
BenOr 1989		6	0.88	32	0.00	16	0.17	13	0.47	3	0.63	4	0.54
Biret 1990		25	0.84	33	0.00	31	0.05	32	0.12	35	0.06	48	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		47	0.78	65	0.00	47	0.09	35	0.09	25	0.27	27	0.16
Chiu 1999		44	0.79	22	0.01	35	0.05	57	0.05	12	0.35	36	0.13
Clidat 1994		37	0.80	40	0.00	37	0.06	48	0.06	24	0.34	35	0.14
Cohen 1997		64	0.56	66	0.00	64	0.04	62	0.04	53	0.04	63	0.04
Cortot 1951		57	0.73	55	0.00	55	0.06	43	0.06	41	0.05	59	0.05
Csalog 1996		21	0.84	23	0.01	23	0.06	22	0.26	12	0.47	18	0.35
Czerny 1989		51	0.75	14	0.01	53	0.08	37	0.08	35	0.06	49	0.07
Ezaki 2006		54	0.74	10	0.02	56	0.06	52	0.06	36	0.07	52	0.06
Falvay 1989		15	0.86	3	0.16	3	0.16	15	0.46	11	0.43	14	0.44
Fiorentino 1962		20	0.85	46	0.00	29	0.06	29	0.16	30	0.15	31	0.15
Fliere 1977		16	0.86	67	0.00	22	0.10	18	0.33	17	0.36	19	0.34
Fou 1978		42	0.79	53	0.00	25	0.06	28	0.16	18	0.30	25	0.22
Francois 1956		62	0.62	45	0.00	62	0.03	65	0.03	63	0.03	67	0.03
Goldenweiser 1946		50	0.77	29	0.00	42	0.06	53	0.06	17	0.31	32	0.14
Gornostaeva 1994		33	0.82	28	0.00	46	0.07	41	0.07	30	0.13	44	0.10
Groot 1988		9	0.88	12	0.01	7	0.09	14	0.47	20	0.32	16	0.39
Hatto 1993		7	0.88	59	0.00	9	0.10	6	0.54	8	0.55	5	0.54
Hatto 1997		8	0.88	9	0.02	5	0.18	4	0.57	6	0.57	3	0.57
Horszowski 1983		53	0.74	27	0.00	34	0.05	55	0.05	25	0.16	45	0.09
Indjic 2001		4	0.89	5	0.04	4	0.13	3	0.58	5	0.58	2	0.58
Katin 1996		13	0.87	18	0.01	17	0.17	9	0.49	9	0.51	8	0.50
Kiepura 1999		61	0.63	39	0.00	61	0.05	58	0.05	58	0.03	60	0.04
Korecka 1992		43	0.79	52	0.00	50	0.09	36	0.09	37	0.07	46	0.08
Kushner 1990		49	0.77	42	0.00	38	0.06	47	0.06	22	0.24	38	0.12
Lilamand 2001		58	0.70	51	0.00	52	0.06	46	0.06	15	0.41	29	0.16
Luisada 1990		30	0.83	43	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.11	41	0.05	51	0.07
Luisada 2008		24	0.84	49	0.00	39	0.06	45	0.06	35	0.08	50	0.07
Lushtak 2004		28	0.83	41	0.00	40	0.05	54	0.05	43	0.05	57	0.05
Malcuzynski 1951		55	0.74	54	0.00	41	0.05	56	0.05	10	0.33	37	0.13
Malcuzynski 1961		29	0.83	15	0.01	12	0.12	12	0.48	11	0.43	12	0.45
Magaloff 1977		10	0.88	25	0.00	13	0.12	10	0.49	2	0.51	9	0.50
Magin 1975		27	0.83	31	0.00	24	0.06	25	0.18	32	0.20	26	0.19
Meguri 1997		38	0.80	34	0.00	49	0.08	38	0.08	25	0.26	34	0.14
Milkina 1970		23	0.84	17	0.01	26	0.06	24	0.19	14	0.39	23	0.27
Mohovich 1999		41	0.79	44	0.00	48	0.07	40	0.07	49	0.04	58	0.05
Nezu 2005		40	0.79	24	0.01	36	0.06	49	0.06	29	0.17	43	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		5	0.88	6	0.04	11	0.17	7	0.53	8	0.51	7	0.52
Olejniczak 1990		14	0.86	61	0.00	20	0.09	20	0.31	23	0.32	20	0.31
Osinska 1989		34	0.82	20	0.01	45	0.06	42	0.06	62	0.03	61	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		32	0.82	58	0.00	43	0.06	50	0.06	5	0.39	30	0.15
Poblocka 1999		19	0.85	48	0.00	30	0.08	27	0.17	40	0.06	41	0.10
Rangell 2001		48	0.77	35	0.00	54	0.06	44	0.06	29	0.12	47	0.08
Richter 1960		56	0.73	11	0.01	58	0.06	51	0.06	46	0.05	54	0.05
Richter 1961		63	0.62	62	0.00	63	0.04	63	0.04	54	0.03	64	0.03
Rosen 1989		22	0.84	4	0.05	6	0.10	17	0.39	6	0.44	15	0.41
Rubinstein 1939		26	0.84	36	0.00	21	0.10	21	0.30	19	0.29	21	0.29
Rubinstein 1952		2	0.89	2	0.17	2	0.27	2	0.65	3	0.61	1	0.63
Rubinstein 1966		18	0.85	16	0.01	28	0.05	23	0.22	55	0.05	42	0.10
Rudanovskaya 2007		52	0.74	47	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	39	0.06	56	0.05
Shebanova 2002		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Smith 1975		31	0.83	37	0.00	14	0.15	19	0.32	8	0.41	17	0.36
Sztompka 1959		35	0.81	60	0.00	44	0.07	39	0.07	12	0.38	28	0.16
Tanyel 1992		45	0.78	13	0.01	51	0.09	34	0.09	33	0.13	40	0.11
Tsujii 2005		3	0.89	8	0.02	8	0.10	8	0.52	6	0.43	10	0.47
Uninsky 1959		11	0.87	7	0.02	10	0.12	5	0.54	6	0.51	6	0.52
Vardi 1988		59	0.68	30	0.00	57	0.05	59	0.05	47	0.05	53	0.05
Wasowski 1980		12	0.87	38	0.00	15	0.14	11	0.49	10	0.41	11	0.45
Zimerman 1975		36	0.81	21	0.01	27	0.05	30	0.12	33	0.12	39	0.12
Average		1	0.92	1	0.28	1	0.28	1	0.72	23	0.28	13	0.45
Random 1		67	-0.11	50	0.00	66	0.02	66	0.02	46	0.04	65	0.03
Random 2		66	0.04	64	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	26	0.23	55	0.05
Random 3		65	0.13	56	0.00	65	0.03	64	0.03	39	0.05	62	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).