Random 2

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		40	0.00	36	0.00	50	0.05	41	0.05	67	0.01	57	0.02
Ax 1995		47	-0.01	24	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.13	67	0.01	33	0.04
Bacha 1998		45	-0.01	38	0.00	61	0.02	63	0.02	67	0.01	63	0.01
Barbosa 1983		2	0.10	2	0.10	3	0.16	2	0.59	66	0.02	4	0.11
BenOr 1989		19	0.06	27	0.00	17	0.08	17	0.35	66	0.02	15	0.08
Biret 1990		37	0.02	32	0.00	49	0.05	40	0.05	67	0.01	59	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		26	0.04	45	0.00	37	0.07	36	0.07	67	0.01	35	0.03
Chiu 1999		22	0.04	18	0.01	30	0.07	31	0.16	67	0.01	31	0.04
Clidat 1994		28	0.03	23	0.01	35	0.06	38	0.06	67	0.01	52	0.02
Cohen 1997		65	-0.07	13	0.01	66	0.02	66	0.02	67	0.01	67	0.01
Cortot 1951		12	0.07	11	0.02	15	0.08	19	0.35	67	0.01	21	0.06
Csalog 1996		29	0.03	31	0.00	34	0.09	34	0.09	66	0.02	32	0.04
Czerny 1989		27	0.03	19	0.01	27	0.07	22	0.29	67	0.01	26	0.05
Ezaki 2006		39	0.00	10	0.02	24	0.08	25	0.25	66	0.02	16	0.07
Falvay 1989		41	0.00	63	0.00	48	0.04	47	0.04	67	0.01	41	0.02
Fiorentino 1962		38	0.00	29	0.00	51	0.03	53	0.03	67	0.01	58	0.02
Fliere 1977		8	0.07	44	0.00	19	0.07	13	0.36	67	0.01	17	0.06
Fou 1978		64	-0.07	50	0.00	54	0.03	57	0.03	67	0.01	42	0.02
Francois 1956		57	-0.04	14	0.01	46	0.05	43	0.05	67	0.01	60	0.02
Goldenweiser 1946		50	-0.02	52	0.00	29	0.07	30	0.17	67	0.01	30	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		25	0.04	42	0.00	14	0.08	16	0.36	66	0.02	14	0.08
Groot 1988		20	0.05	43	0.00	36	0.07	35	0.07	67	0.01	36	0.03
Hatto 1993		16	0.06	21	0.01	18	0.08	9	0.41	66	0.02	11	0.09
Hatto 1997		18	0.06	56	0.00	20	0.08	11	0.39	66	0.02	8	0.09
Horszowski 1983		23	0.04	48	0.00	13	0.08	23	0.29	66	0.02	12	0.08
Indjic 2001		14	0.06	61	0.00	21	0.09	12	0.37	66	0.02	10	0.09
Katin 1996		17	0.06	65	0.00	31	0.08	28	0.20	66	0.02	18	0.06
Kiepura 1999		66	-0.09	12	0.01	57	0.03	59	0.03	67	0.01	38	0.02
Korecka 1992		33	0.02	20	0.01	28	0.10	24	0.28	67	0.01	25	0.05
Kushner 1990		56	-0.04	55	0.00	55	0.04	51	0.04	67	0.01	47	0.02
Lilamand 2001		10	0.07	5	0.06	2	0.18	5	0.45	66	0.02	7	0.09
Luisada 1990		63	-0.06	62	0.00	62	0.02	64	0.02	67	0.01	64	0.01
Luisada 2008		59	-0.05	54	0.00	63	0.03	58	0.03	67	0.01	51	0.02
Lushtak 2004		55	-0.03	49	0.00	52	0.04	52	0.04	67	0.01	53	0.02
Malcuzynski 1951		31	0.02	47	0.00	12	0.09	15	0.36	67	0.01	22	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		44	-0.01	64	0.00	41	0.04	45	0.04	67	0.01	45	0.02
Magaloff 1977		7	0.08	34	0.00	16	0.07	7	0.42	66	0.02	9	0.09
Magin 1975		5	0.09	6	0.04	4	0.16	4	0.54	66	0.02	5	0.10
Meguri 1997		53	-0.02	9	0.03	53	0.03	56	0.03	67	0.01	48	0.02
Milkina 1970		43	0.00	37	0.00	45	0.04	50	0.04	67	0.01	43	0.02
Mohovich 1999		49	-0.02	26	0.00	64	0.03	55	0.03	67	0.01	56	0.02
Nezu 2005		67	-0.11	58	0.00	67	0.01	67	0.01	67	0.01	66	0.01
Ohlsson 1999		6	0.09	30	0.00	9	0.08	10	0.39	66	0.01	19	0.06
Olejniczak 1990		34	0.02	46	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.07	67	0.01	37	0.03
Osinska 1989		54	-0.03	66	0.00	59	0.02	61	0.02	67	0.01	61	0.01
Perlemuter 1992		13	0.06	16	0.01	10	0.08	8	0.41	66	0.02	6	0.09
Poblocka 1999		60	-0.05	40	0.00	60	0.02	65	0.02	67	0.01	62	0.01
Rangell 2001		32	0.02	17	0.01	25	0.07	29	0.19	67	0.01	34	0.04
Richter 1960		42	0.00	28	0.00	42	0.05	44	0.05	67	0.01	50	0.02
Richter 1961		30	0.03	25	0.00	40	0.05	42	0.05	67	0.01	40	0.02
Rosen 1989		52	-0.02	57	0.00	56	0.03	54	0.03	67	0.01	55	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		15	0.06	33	0.00	23	0.08	27	0.23	67	0.01	24	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		9	0.07	15	0.01	22	0.09	20	0.31	67	0.01	23	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		4	0.09	7	0.04	8	0.08	21	0.29	67	0.01	27	0.05
Rudanovskaya 2007		24	0.04	35	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.12	66	0.02	29	0.05
Shebanova 2002		21	0.04	53	0.00	26	0.07	26	0.23	67	0.01	28	0.05
Smith 1975		11	0.07	22	0.01	11	0.09	18	0.35	66	0.02	13	0.08
Sztompka 1959		1	0.12	1	0.34	1	0.33	1	0.60	66	0.02	3	0.11
Tanyel 1992		58	-0.05	51	0.00	65	0.02	62	0.02	67	0.01	65	0.01
Tsujii 2005		36	0.02	59	0.00	43	0.04	49	0.04	67	0.01	54	0.02
Uninsky 1959		51	-0.02	39	0.00	47	0.06	39	0.06	67	0.01	44	0.02
Vardi 1988		62	-0.06	60	0.00	58	0.03	60	0.03	67	0.01	46	0.02
Wasowski 1980		48	-0.02	41	0.00	39	0.04	48	0.04	67	0.01	39	0.02
Zimerman 1975		3	0.10	8	0.03	5	0.20	3	0.56	66	0.03	2	0.13
Average		35	0.02	67	0.00	44	0.04	46	0.04	67	0.01	49	0.02
Random 1		61	-0.06	3	0.09	7	0.13	14	0.36	16	0.24	1	0.29
Random 2		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 3		46	-0.01	4	0.06	6	0.14	6	0.42	67	0.01	20	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).