Uninsky 1959

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		2	0.90	1	0.21	1	0.21	2	0.61	4	0.47	2	0.54
Ax 1995		52	0.75	37	0.00	51	0.06	40	0.06	26	0.18	42	0.10
Bacha 1998		16	0.86	47	0.00	11	0.10	10	0.48	8	0.49	8	0.48
Barbosa 1983		46	0.76	41	0.00	31	0.10	28	0.21	11	0.48	19	0.32
BenOr 1989		32	0.82	40	0.00	38	0.05	52	0.05	44	0.06	60	0.05
Biret 1990		9	0.87	22	0.01	15	0.08	14	0.41	16	0.33	18	0.37
Brailowsky 1960		43	0.78	21	0.01	49	0.06	34	0.06	28	0.19	37	0.11
Chiu 1999		41	0.79	57	0.00	45	0.05	45	0.05	22	0.21	40	0.10
Clidat 1994		34	0.81	49	0.00	33	0.06	41	0.06	17	0.42	32	0.16
Cohen 1997		62	0.64	32	0.00	63	0.05	51	0.05	37	0.08	54	0.06
Cortot 1951		57	0.70	64	0.00	56	0.04	59	0.04	44	0.04	63	0.04
Csalog 1996		38	0.81	15	0.01	41	0.05	48	0.05	22	0.30	36	0.12
Czerny 1989		55	0.72	44	0.00	50	0.06	39	0.06	36	0.06	53	0.06
Ezaki 2006		44	0.77	55	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	27	0.16	45	0.08
Falvay 1989		1	0.91	3	0.10	3	0.23	1	0.64	1	0.55	1	0.59
Fiorentino 1962		26	0.83	36	0.00	36	0.05	49	0.05	35	0.07	55	0.06
Fliere 1977		17	0.85	42	0.00	34	0.06	36	0.06	31	0.12	48	0.08
Fou 1978		28	0.83	6	0.05	12	0.10	18	0.39	2	0.53	11	0.45
Francois 1956		60	0.68	11	0.02	60	0.03	63	0.03	25	0.19	52	0.08
Goldenweiser 1946		58	0.70	18	0.01	39	0.06	38	0.06	29	0.12	47	0.08
Gornostaeva 1994		35	0.81	56	0.00	46	0.05	43	0.05	30	0.13	51	0.08
Groot 1988		11	0.86	28	0.00	24	0.11	24	0.28	41	0.07	34	0.14
Hatto 1993		3	0.89	51	0.00	9	0.11	11	0.45	8	0.49	10	0.47
Hatto 1997		5	0.89	9	0.04	4	0.10	3	0.53	7	0.53	4	0.53
Horszowski 1983		51	0.76	39	0.00	30	0.07	30	0.18	20	0.17	31	0.17
Indjic 2001		4	0.89	45	0.00	10	0.10	8	0.49	7	0.52	6	0.50
Katin 1996		14	0.86	20	0.01	21	0.08	23	0.28	18	0.32	22	0.30
Kiepura 1999		61	0.67	25	0.01	58	0.03	64	0.03	27	0.22	46	0.08
Korecka 1992		21	0.85	27	0.01	18	0.10	20	0.33	9	0.43	15	0.38
Kushner 1990		47	0.76	53	0.00	29	0.08	29	0.20	18	0.30	26	0.24
Lilamand 2001		63	0.60	33	0.00	44	0.04	54	0.04	40	0.07	57	0.05
Luisada 1990		24	0.83	10	0.02	22	0.08	21	0.31	28	0.18	27	0.24
Luisada 2008		20	0.85	14	0.01	14	0.08	19	0.39	17	0.36	16	0.37
Lushtak 2004		29	0.83	58	0.00	47	0.06	35	0.06	55	0.04	59	0.05
Malcuzynski 1951		59	0.69	12	0.02	40	0.05	47	0.05	22	0.18	44	0.09
Malcuzynski 1961		19	0.85	5	0.05	5	0.10	6	0.50	3	0.49	7	0.49
Magaloff 1977		18	0.85	17	0.01	16	0.07	17	0.40	5	0.46	12	0.43
Magin 1975		22	0.85	38	0.00	26	0.09	26	0.23	19	0.31	24	0.27
Meguri 1997		42	0.79	54	0.00	43	0.05	50	0.05	15	0.36	35	0.13
Milkina 1970		25	0.83	4	0.05	6	0.09	9	0.48	1	0.58	3	0.53
Mohovich 1999		39	0.80	65	0.00	37	0.05	46	0.05	25	0.24	38	0.11
Nezu 2005		30	0.82	30	0.00	25	0.09	27	0.22	15	0.39	23	0.29
Ohlsson 1999		6	0.89	7	0.04	8	0.08	4	0.51	15	0.43	9	0.47
Olejniczak 1990		27	0.83	59	0.00	42	0.06	42	0.06	36	0.06	56	0.06
Osinska 1989		15	0.86	19	0.01	13	0.08	22	0.29	19	0.23	25	0.26
Perlemuter 1992		45	0.76	66	0.00	53	0.03	62	0.03	47	0.04	64	0.03
Poblocka 1999		12	0.86	16	0.01	19	0.11	15	0.41	11	0.40	14	0.40
Rangell 2001		54	0.75	50	0.00	57	0.04	57	0.04	53	0.04	62	0.04
Richter 1960		49	0.76	46	0.00	52	0.04	60	0.04	29	0.15	49	0.08
Richter 1961		56	0.72	60	0.00	61	0.04	55	0.04	29	0.24	39	0.10
Rosen 1989		40	0.80	13	0.02	27	0.08	25	0.23	18	0.26	28	0.24
Rubinstein 1939		36	0.81	24	0.01	35	0.06	37	0.06	30	0.15	43	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		33	0.82	8	0.04	23	0.10	16	0.41	21	0.23	21	0.31
Rubinstein 1966		10	0.86	29	0.00	17	0.07	13	0.43	18	0.24	20	0.32
Rudanovskaya 2007		53	0.75	34	0.00	62	0.04	56	0.04	34	0.07	58	0.05
Shebanova 2002		8	0.87	2	0.17	2	0.17	5	0.51	4	0.54	5	0.52
Smith 1975		37	0.81	52	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.11	20	0.28	29	0.18
Sztompka 1959		31	0.82	48	0.00	48	0.07	33	0.07	18	0.29	33	0.14
Tanyel 1992		48	0.76	35	0.00	54	0.05	44	0.05	58	0.04	61	0.04
Tsujii 2005		7	0.87	31	0.00	7	0.11	12	0.45	18	0.31	17	0.37
Uninsky 1959		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Vardi 1988		50	0.76	26	0.01	55	0.05	53	0.05	27	0.21	41	0.10
Wasowski 1980		13	0.86	23	0.01	20	0.14	7	0.50	15	0.33	13	0.41
Zimerman 1975		23	0.84	43	0.00	28	0.06	31	0.14	20	0.22	30	0.18
Random 1		66	-0.17	61	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	43	0.04	65	0.03
Random 2		65	-0.02	62	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	39	0.06	66	0.02
Random 3		64	0.13	63	0.00	64	0.04	58	0.04	26	0.15	50	0.08

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).