Tsujii 2005

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		39	0.74	5	0.05	2	0.11	9	0.49	9	0.51	9	0.50
Ax 1995		57	0.68	37	0.00	44	0.04	62	0.04	14	0.35	44	0.12
Bacha 1998		48	0.71	34	0.00	48	0.05	46	0.05	35	0.10	57	0.07
Barbosa 1983		61	0.63	44	0.00	53	0.06	36	0.06	27	0.22	48	0.11
BenOr 1989		16	0.81	22	0.01	19	0.08	13	0.44	6	0.63	7	0.53
Biret 1990		1	0.83	8	0.02	5	0.16	2	0.61	5	0.59	3	0.60
Brailowsky 1960		55	0.69	48	0.00	57	0.04	59	0.04	32	0.14	56	0.07
Chiu 1999		44	0.73	13	0.01	45	0.04	58	0.04	25	0.16	54	0.08
Clidat 1994		50	0.70	40	0.00	38	0.05	43	0.05	21	0.42	36	0.14
Cohen 1997		63	0.61	49	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	11	0.51	38	0.14
Cortot 1951		49	0.71	38	0.00	54	0.06	38	0.06	1	0.54	33	0.18
Csalog 1996		21	0.80	9	0.02	28	0.07	25	0.25	19	0.39	23	0.31
Czerny 1989		46	0.72	62	0.00	46	0.04	60	0.04	24	0.34	43	0.12
Ezaki 2006		37	0.75	59	0.00	56	0.04	48	0.04	10	0.39	41	0.12
Falvay 1989		2	0.83	10	0.02	13	0.11	4	0.59	17	0.39	13	0.48
Fiorentino 1962		3	0.83	2	0.10	8	0.11	10	0.46	3	0.61	6	0.53
Fliere 1977		22	0.79	56	0.00	40	0.04	61	0.04	25	0.20	52	0.09
Fou 1978		42	0.73	39	0.00	20	0.09	24	0.27	20	0.24	31	0.25
Francois 1956		54	0.69	45	0.00	62	0.04	52	0.04	27	0.18	55	0.08
Goldenweiser 1946		51	0.70	30	0.00	49	0.04	47	0.04	16	0.30	46	0.11
Gornostaeva 1994		43	0.73	28	0.00	50	0.05	41	0.05	18	0.41	39	0.14
Groot 1988		4	0.82	11	0.02	14	0.09	17	0.39	27	0.18	30	0.26
Hatto 1993		29	0.78	33	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.05	38	0.08	60	0.06
Hatto 1997		31	0.78	17	0.01	36	0.07	35	0.07	31	0.13	50	0.10
Horszowski 1983		59	0.67	65	0.00	47	0.04	56	0.04	52	0.05	63	0.04
Indjic 2001		26	0.78	57	0.00	41	0.04	53	0.04	44	0.07	62	0.05
Katin 1996		6	0.82	14	0.01	29	0.08	22	0.28	20	0.32	25	0.30
Kiepura 1999		62	0.63	63	0.00	59	0.04	51	0.04	23	0.21	51	0.09
Korecka 1992		40	0.74	46	0.00	52	0.04	49	0.04	22	0.29	47	0.11
Kushner 1990		47	0.71	31	0.00	17	0.09	20	0.31	9	0.55	17	0.41
Lilamand 2001		58	0.67	64	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	18	0.30	49	0.11
Luisada 1990		5	0.82	1	0.37	1	0.37	1	0.66	4	0.60	2	0.63
Luisada 2008		34	0.76	47	0.00	24	0.08	21	0.29	23	0.23	28	0.26
Lushtak 2004		17	0.81	32	0.00	15	0.08	14	0.42	6	0.57	12	0.49
Malcuzynski 1951		60	0.65	24	0.01	35	0.06	37	0.06	18	0.25	45	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		52	0.70	43	0.00	37	0.07	34	0.07	48	0.06	59	0.06
Magaloff 1977		10	0.81	16	0.01	21	0.08	18	0.35	4	0.57	15	0.45
Magin 1975		32	0.78	26	0.01	22	0.09	27	0.25	17	0.32	27	0.28
Meguri 1997		24	0.79	52	0.00	32	0.11	30	0.21	4	0.62	20	0.36
Milkina 1970		38	0.75	53	0.00	51	0.04	50	0.04	31	0.10	58	0.06
Mohovich 1999		28	0.78	12	0.01	27	0.06	26	0.25	20	0.28	29	0.26
Nezu 2005		19	0.80	3	0.08	6	0.12	7	0.52	3	0.60	5	0.56
Ohlsson 1999		20	0.80	6	0.05	18	0.08	23	0.28	22	0.32	26	0.30
Olejniczak 1990		13	0.81	41	0.00	31	0.09	29	0.23	15	0.43	24	0.31
Osinska 1989		8	0.82	25	0.01	10	0.12	8	0.50	14	0.32	18	0.40
Perlemuter 1992		41	0.73	54	0.00	60	0.05	44	0.05	14	0.28	42	0.12
Poblocka 1999		9	0.82	51	0.00	23	0.07	15	0.42	19	0.33	19	0.37
Rangell 2001		18	0.80	20	0.01	30	0.09	28	0.24	1	0.80	16	0.44
Richter 1960		25	0.79	7	0.04	33	0.07	33	0.07	15	0.36	35	0.16
Richter 1961		56	0.68	58	0.00	61	0.05	45	0.05	31	0.14	53	0.08
Rosen 1989		12	0.81	21	0.01	16	0.08	16	0.42	5	0.60	8	0.50
Rubinstein 1939		23	0.79	55	0.00	9	0.10	12	0.46	9	0.53	10	0.49
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.76	35	0.00	12	0.10	19	0.35	17	0.30	22	0.32
Rubinstein 1966		7	0.82	18	0.01	4	0.15	5	0.58	11	0.41	11	0.49
Rudanovskaya 2007		30	0.78	42	0.00	39	0.04	55	0.04	9	0.51	37	0.14
Shebanova 2002		11	0.81	4	0.06	7	0.12	3	0.60	7	0.58	4	0.59
Smith 1975		27	0.78	36	0.00	43	0.04	54	0.04	12	0.45	40	0.13
Sztompka 1959		53	0.70	61	0.00	63	0.05	40	0.05	49	0.05	61	0.05
Tanyel 1992		14	0.81	15	0.01	3	0.12	6	0.56	1	0.83	1	0.68
Tsujii 2005		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Uninsky 1959		15	0.81	23	0.01	11	0.10	11	0.46	10	0.47	14	0.46
Vardi 1988		45	0.72	19	0.01	26	0.07	32	0.17	1	0.66	21	0.33
Wasowski 1980		35	0.76	29	0.00	25	0.08	31	0.18	21	0.33	32	0.24
Zimerman 1975		33	0.77	27	0.00	34	0.05	39	0.05	10	0.56	34	0.17
Random 1		66	-0.04	60	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	54	0.03	66	0.02
Random 2		65	0.02	66	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	37	0.06	64	0.03
Random 3		64	0.03	50	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	50	0.03	65	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).