Random 2

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		48	0.00	27	0.00	58	0.03	58	0.03	66	0.01	56	0.02
Ax 1995		45	0.00	16	0.01	39	0.06	39	0.06	66	0.01	57	0.02
Bacha 1998		42	0.00	60	0.00	59	0.03	53	0.03	66	0.01	47	0.02
Barbosa 1983		18	0.04	24	0.00	14	0.08	19	0.26	65	0.02	14	0.07
BenOr 1989		2	0.07	2	0.27	2	0.35	2	0.53	64	0.02	4	0.10
Biret 1990		8	0.06	6	0.03	11	0.08	21	0.24	66	0.01	28	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		53	-0.01	31	0.00	52	0.03	52	0.03	66	0.01	42	0.02
Chiu 1999		41	0.00	26	0.00	37	0.06	38	0.06	66	0.01	44	0.02
Clidat 1994		15	0.04	25	0.00	15	0.08	18	0.28	65	0.02	17	0.07
Cohen 1997		57	-0.02	13	0.01	64	0.02	63	0.02	66	0.01	65	0.01
Cortot 1951		16	0.04	8	0.02	10	0.10	13	0.33	66	0.01	25	0.06
Csalog 1996		11	0.05	14	0.01	25	0.09	17	0.28	65	0.02	15	0.07
Czerny 1989		14	0.04	37	0.00	20	0.06	11	0.35	66	0.01	19	0.06
Ezaki 2006		36	0.01	35	0.00	21	0.07	20	0.24	65	0.02	11	0.07
Falvay 1989		43	0.00	54	0.00	54	0.04	46	0.04	66	0.01	45	0.02
Fiorentino 1962		26	0.02	15	0.01	36	0.08	33	0.08	66	0.01	36	0.03
Fliere 1977		10	0.05	18	0.01	17	0.07	15	0.32	66	0.01	18	0.06
Fou 1978		52	-0.01	47	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.05	66	0.01	46	0.02
Francois 1956		65	-0.04	19	0.00	61	0.02	62	0.02	66	0.01	66	0.01
Goldenweiser 1946		54	-0.01	40	0.00	53	0.03	48	0.03	66	0.01	41	0.02
Gornostaeva 1994		13	0.04	29	0.00	8	0.09	4	0.43	65	0.02	7	0.09
Groot 1988		37	0.01	42	0.00	43	0.07	36	0.07	66	0.01	37	0.03
Hatto 1993		7	0.06	38	0.00	13	0.10	7	0.40	65	0.02	8	0.09
Hatto 1997		17	0.04	66	0.00	29	0.09	23	0.22	66	0.01	27	0.05
Horszowski 1983		30	0.02	62	0.00	33	0.06	40	0.06	66	0.01	39	0.02
Indjic 2001		5	0.06	39	0.00	12	0.07	6	0.41	65	0.02	6	0.09
Katin 1996		35	0.01	59	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.05	66	0.01	50	0.02
Kiepura 1999		63	-0.03	11	0.01	47	0.03	55	0.03	66	0.01	38	0.02
Korecka 1992		50	-0.01	55	0.00	49	0.04	45	0.04	66	0.01	48	0.02
Kushner 1990		22	0.03	23	0.00	32	0.06	32	0.11	66	0.01	32	0.03
Lilamand 2001		12	0.04	7	0.02	4	0.14	3	0.51	66	0.01	16	0.07
Luisada 1990		55	-0.01	56	0.00	45	0.03	51	0.03	66	0.01	53	0.02
Luisada 2008		60	-0.02	44	0.00	48	0.03	50	0.03	66	0.01	51	0.02
Lushtak 2004		49	0.00	30	0.00	38	0.07	35	0.07	66	0.01	34	0.03
Malcuzynski 1951		56	-0.01	57	0.00	46	0.03	54	0.03	66	0.01	58	0.02
Malcuzynski 1961		32	0.02	64	0.00	35	0.07	34	0.07	66	0.01	31	0.03
Magaloff 1977		6	0.06	22	0.00	22	0.07	14	0.33	66	0.01	23	0.06
Magin 1975		24	0.03	20	0.00	6	0.10	5	0.43	66	0.01	13	0.07
Meguri 1997		51	-0.01	21	0.00	56	0.02	59	0.02	66	0.01	61	0.01
Milkina 1970		29	0.02	43	0.00	27	0.07	24	0.21	65	0.02	20	0.06
Mohovich 1999		44	0.00	53	0.00	51	0.03	56	0.03	66	0.01	55	0.02
Nezu 2005		66	-0.05	58	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	66	0.01	63	0.01
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.02	33	0.00	18	0.07	27	0.19	65	0.02	22	0.06
Olejniczak 1990		9	0.05	28	0.00	16	0.08	10	0.35	65	0.02	10	0.08
Osinska 1989		59	-0.02	65	0.00	62	0.02	64	0.02	66	0.01	59	0.01
Perlemuter 1992		34	0.01	12	0.01	24	0.07	22	0.23	65	0.02	12	0.07
Poblocka 1999		47	0.00	61	0.00	57	0.02	60	0.02	66	0.01	60	0.01
Rangell 2001		19	0.04	5	0.03	7	0.10	9	0.35	64	0.03	5	0.10
Richter 1960		27	0.02	41	0.00	31	0.05	31	0.11	66	0.01	33	0.03
Richter 1961		38	0.01	36	0.00	50	0.03	49	0.03	66	0.01	43	0.02
Rosen 1989		61	-0.02	52	0.00	63	0.02	65	0.02	66	0.01	64	0.01
Rubinstein 1939		21	0.03	46	0.00	19	0.07	30	0.18	66	0.01	30	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		3	0.07	4	0.04	5	0.13	8	0.39	66	0.01	26	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		1	0.08	3	0.11	3	0.16	12	0.34	65	0.02	9	0.08
Rudanovskaya 2007		31	0.02	34	0.00	40	0.05	44	0.05	66	0.01	54	0.02
Shebanova 2002		40	0.01	63	0.00	42	0.05	41	0.05	66	0.01	52	0.02
Smith 1975		20	0.04	17	0.01	26	0.08	29	0.19	66	0.01	29	0.04
Sztompka 1959		4	0.06	1	0.27	1	0.27	1	0.59	65	0.02	2	0.11
Tanyel 1992		62	-0.02	48	0.00	65	0.02	61	0.02	66	0.01	62	0.01
Tsujii 2005		25	0.02	45	0.00	34	0.06	37	0.06	65	0.02	35	0.03
Uninsky 1959		33	0.02	32	0.00	28	0.07	28	0.19	65	0.02	21	0.06
Vardi 1988		46	0.00	49	0.00	55	0.04	47	0.04	66	0.01	49	0.02
Wasowski 1980		58	-0.02	51	0.00	60	0.03	57	0.03	66	0.01	40	0.02
Zimerman 1975		23	0.03	50	0.00	30	0.09	26	0.20	65	0.02	24	0.06
Random 1		64	-0.03	9	0.02	23	0.06	25	0.20	32	0.09	1	0.13
Random 2		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 3		39	0.01	10	0.02	9	0.08	16	0.31	61	0.03	3	0.10

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).