Hatto 1993

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		37	0.73	13	0.00	20	0.11	21	0.37	18	0.35	23	0.36
Ax 1995		50	0.68	36	0.00	47	0.05	54	0.05	25	0.19	45	0.10
Bacha 1998		24	0.77	44	0.00	13	0.11	13	0.53	8	0.52	14	0.52
Barbosa 1983		49	0.69	28	0.00	9	0.11	17	0.48	4	0.62	9	0.55
BenOr 1989		15	0.78	50	0.00	15	0.09	25	0.33	16	0.48	22	0.40
Biret 1990		20	0.78	5	0.00	31	0.12	28	0.25	33	0.08	39	0.14
Brailowsky 1960		52	0.67	18	0.00	52	0.06	43	0.06	38	0.07	51	0.06
Chiu 1999		27	0.76	37	0.00	28	0.08	30	0.24	5	0.42	26	0.32
Clidat 1994		44	0.70	62	0.00	33	0.11	33	0.11	19	0.43	30	0.22
Cohen 1997		63	0.48	31	0.00	63	0.04	58	0.04	46	0.05	64	0.04
Cortot 1951		56	0.63	45	0.00	56	0.06	44	0.06	37	0.05	60	0.05
Csalog 1996		28	0.76	6	0.00	36	0.08	36	0.08	30	0.15	43	0.11
Czerny 1989		33	0.74	23	0.00	27	0.09	26	0.30	4	0.57	21	0.41
Ezaki 2006		40	0.72	51	0.00	49	0.05	57	0.05	21	0.25	42	0.11
Falvay 1989		3	0.86	8	0.00	3	0.29	3	0.70	3	0.57	4	0.63
Fiorentino 1962		30	0.75	38	0.00	39	0.06	45	0.06	26	0.25	40	0.12
Fliere 1977		10	0.80	63	0.00	7	0.11	14	0.53	5	0.61	7	0.57
Fou 1978		23	0.78	14	0.00	10	0.11	11	0.55	3	0.58	8	0.56
Francois 1956		60	0.59	29	0.00	62	0.05	56	0.05	49	0.04	65	0.04
Goldenweiser 1946		53	0.64	39	0.00	42	0.05	51	0.05	28	0.14	49	0.08
Gornostaeva 1994		39	0.72	40	0.00	46	0.09	34	0.09	20	0.39	32	0.19
Groot 1988		4	0.82	15	0.00	5	0.14	6	0.63	8	0.46	12	0.54
Hatto 1993		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1997		2	0.98	2	0.04	2	0.95	2	0.99	2	0.99	1	0.99
Horszowski 1983		43	0.70	52	0.00	29	0.10	31	0.23	19	0.29	28	0.26
Indjic 2001		1	0.99	1	0.96	1	0.94	1	0.99	1	0.99	2	0.99
Katin 1996		13	0.79	53	0.00	18	0.12	16	0.51	13	0.50	16	0.50
Kiepura 1999		61	0.57	21	0.00	55	0.04	59	0.04	27	0.16	48	0.08
Korecka 1992		19	0.78	54	0.00	24	0.09	23	0.34	3	0.54	19	0.43
Kushner 1990		57	0.63	32	0.00	53	0.09	35	0.09	42	0.06	50	0.07
Lilamand 2001		62	0.56	9	0.00	57	0.04	62	0.04	42	0.06	56	0.05
Luisada 1990		12	0.79	16	0.00	6	0.15	4	0.64	13	0.47	10	0.55
Luisada 2008		21	0.78	55	0.00	26	0.10	24	0.33	15	0.35	24	0.34
Lushtak 2004		35	0.74	24	0.00	45	0.07	42	0.07	59	0.04	57	0.05
Malcuzynski 1951		59	0.62	56	0.00	43	0.07	40	0.07	22	0.21	41	0.12
Malcuzynski 1961		26	0.77	19	0.00	11	0.11	8	0.59	11	0.50	11	0.54
Magaloff 1977		29	0.75	3	0.00	37	0.08	37	0.08	20	0.32	33	0.16
Magin 1975		8	0.81	17	0.00	8	0.11	5	0.63	2	0.65	3	0.64
Meguri 1997		42	0.71	33	0.00	54	0.05	50	0.05	32	0.15	46	0.09
Milkina 1970		41	0.71	57	0.00	40	0.07	41	0.07	36	0.06	52	0.06
Mohovich 1999		45	0.69	12	0.00	50	0.05	49	0.05	50	0.05	58	0.05
Nezu 2005		14	0.78	30	0.00	30	0.09	27	0.27	24	0.29	27	0.28
Ohlsson 1999		11	0.80	64	0.00	17	0.12	10	0.56	17	0.40	17	0.47
Olejniczak 1990		25	0.77	46	0.00	35	0.08	39	0.08	22	0.30	36	0.15
Osinska 1989		17	0.78	47	0.00	23	0.09	29	0.25	34	0.09	34	0.15
Perlemuter 1992		55	0.64	41	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	43	0.05	61	0.04
Poblocka 1999		5	0.81	10	0.00	14	0.11	7	0.61	10	0.45	13	0.52
Rangell 2001		54	0.64	48	0.00	60	0.05	52	0.05	39	0.05	59	0.05
Richter 1960		38	0.72	22	0.00	44	0.05	55	0.05	20	0.26	44	0.11
Richter 1961		47	0.69	65	0.00	51	0.06	47	0.06	24	0.35	37	0.14
Rosen 1989		48	0.69	34	0.00	41	0.06	46	0.06	37	0.07	54	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		31	0.75	35	0.00	19	0.12	18	0.44	14	0.40	20	0.42
Rubinstein 1952		32	0.74	58	0.00	22	0.11	19	0.44	20	0.27	25	0.34
Rubinstein 1966		22	0.78	59	0.00	25	0.10	22	0.35	31	0.13	31	0.21
Rudanovskaya 2007		51	0.68	42	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	52	0.04	62	0.04
Shebanova 2002		9	0.80	25	0.00	4	0.19	9	0.59	9	0.57	6	0.58
Smith 1975		36	0.73	60	0.00	38	0.06	48	0.06	22	0.38	35	0.15
Sztompka 1959		16	0.78	26	0.00	21	0.09	20	0.42	3	0.63	15	0.51
Tanyel 1992		58	0.62	20	0.00	58	0.03	63	0.03	36	0.06	63	0.04
Tsujii 2005		18	0.78	27	0.00	34	0.08	38	0.08	42	0.05	53	0.06
Uninsky 1959		7	0.81	49	0.00	16	0.08	12	0.55	13	0.38	18	0.46
Vardi 1988		46	0.69	11	0.00	48	0.05	53	0.05	17	0.39	38	0.14
Wasowski 1980		34	0.74	4	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.17	26	0.30	29	0.23
Zimerman 1975		6	0.81	7	0.00	12	0.11	15	0.53	2	0.73	5	0.62
Random 1		66	0.00	43	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	10	0.32	55	0.06
Random 2		64	0.06	66	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	7	0.40	47	0.09
Random 3		65	0.02	61	0.00	64	0.02	64	0.02	45	0.04	66	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).