Ezaki 2006

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Ashkenazy 1981		40	0.66	31	0.00	11	0.07	13	0.36	40	0.06	11	0.15
Ax 1995		30	0.68	10	0.02	4	0.12	6	0.44	18	0.28	4	0.35
Bacha 1998		60	0.56	42	0.00	62	0.03	61	0.03	62	0.04	63	0.03
Barbosa 1983		51	0.60	7	0.03	5	0.15	5	0.46	35	0.09	7	0.20
BenOr 1989		6	0.73	36	0.00	6	0.12	4	0.50	44	0.07	8	0.19
Biret 1990		34	0.67	47	0.00	50	0.06	44	0.06	59	0.04	49	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		61	0.55	60	0.00	60	0.03	60	0.03	49	0.05	55	0.04
Chiu 1999		17	0.72	13	0.01	18	0.08	14	0.33	31	0.12	6	0.20
Clidat 1994		56	0.59	49	0.00	46	0.06	48	0.06	61	0.03	58	0.04
Cohen 1997		63	0.53	48	0.00	61	0.03	63	0.03	50	0.04	65	0.03
Cortot 1951		58	0.58	50	0.00	57	0.03	62	0.03	54	0.04	66	0.03
Csalog 1996		19	0.71	5	0.05	8	0.09	30	0.15	45	0.06	31	0.09
Czerny 1989		10	0.73	1	0.31	1	0.31	2	0.64	8	0.52	2	0.58
Ezaki 2006		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Falvay 1989		2	0.75	12	0.01	10	0.07	12	0.36	55	0.04	18	0.12
Fiorentino 1962		20	0.71	19	0.01	40	0.06	45	0.06	53	0.04	47	0.05
Fliere 1977		44	0.65	46	0.00	56	0.05	52	0.05	64	0.03	54	0.04
Fou 1978		39	0.67	21	0.01	27	0.06	25	0.22	52	0.05	28	0.10
Francois 1956		48	0.62	44	0.00	48	0.07	37	0.07	39	0.07	36	0.07
Goldenweiser 1946		49	0.61	29	0.00	12	0.08	17	0.30	45	0.05	17	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		31	0.68	4	0.05	7	0.10	15	0.33	40	0.06	14	0.14
Groot 1988		23	0.70	65	0.00	36	0.06	42	0.06	56	0.04	50	0.05
Hatto 1993		16	0.72	57	0.00	26	0.06	21	0.25	57	0.05	26	0.11
Hatto 1997		24	0.70	6	0.04	25	0.07	20	0.28	52	0.06	15	0.13
Horszowski 1983		42	0.65	28	0.00	19	0.09	19	0.29	46	0.05	16	0.12
Indjic 2001		21	0.70	32	0.00	30	0.08	28	0.16	42	0.07	25	0.11
Katin 1996		14	0.72	22	0.00	24	0.07	23	0.24	47	0.05	21	0.11
Kiepura 1999		59	0.57	15	0.01	42	0.06	49	0.06	35	0.06	37	0.06
Korecka 1992		47	0.62	37	0.00	55	0.04	55	0.04	55	0.04	57	0.04
Kushner 1990		45	0.63	51	0.00	22	0.07	29	0.16	40	0.06	29	0.10
Lilamand 2001		38	0.67	39	0.00	15	0.09	16	0.30	15	0.37	5	0.33
Luisada 1990		8	0.73	24	0.00	17	0.09	8	0.42	51	0.05	13	0.14
Luisada 2008		33	0.67	52	0.00	37	0.06	43	0.06	60	0.04	45	0.05
Lushtak 2004		7	0.73	35	0.00	29	0.09	24	0.24	54	0.04	30	0.10
Malcuzynski 1951		62	0.53	56	0.00	43	0.06	50	0.06	41	0.05	51	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		50	0.61	25	0.00	21	0.09	18	0.29	54	0.05	19	0.12
Magaloff 1977		11	0.73	34	0.00	13	0.08	7	0.44	45	0.05	10	0.15
Magin 1975		12	0.73	30	0.00	14	0.09	9	0.42	38	0.07	9	0.17
Meguri 1997		18	0.71	38	0.00	39	0.08	33	0.08	38	0.07	34	0.07
Milkina 1970		1	0.76	2	0.17	2	0.42	1	0.65	10	0.42	3	0.52
Mohovich 1999		43	0.65	41	0.00	51	0.07	35	0.07	45	0.05	40	0.06
Nezu 2005		22	0.70	16	0.01	35	0.07	38	0.07	51	0.04	46	0.05
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.69	27	0.00	38	0.07	34	0.07	53	0.05	38	0.06
Olejniczak 1990		15	0.72	62	0.00	32	0.05	32	0.10	56	0.04	41	0.06
Osinska 1989		9	0.73	8	0.02	20	0.10	22	0.25	55	0.04	27	0.10
Perlemuter 1992		55	0.59	59	0.00	63	0.04	57	0.04	59	0.03	61	0.03
Poblocka 1999		4	0.74	20	0.01	16	0.09	11	0.37	48	0.05	12	0.14
Rangell 2001		5	0.74	3	0.14	3	0.24	3	0.56	4	0.69	1	0.62
Richter 1960		41	0.65	14	0.01	47	0.06	39	0.06	56	0.04	44	0.05
Richter 1961		54	0.59	63	0.00	58	0.03	59	0.03	59	0.04	62	0.03
Rosen 1989		29	0.68	26	0.00	34	0.06	46	0.06	30	0.15	32	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		52	0.59	40	0.00	53	0.05	54	0.05	63	0.04	56	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		57	0.58	61	0.00	52	0.06	40	0.06	57	0.05	52	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		32	0.68	55	0.00	33	0.06	41	0.06	41	0.06	39	0.06
Rudanovskaya 2007		35	0.67	53	0.00	59	0.04	58	0.04	55	0.04	59	0.04
Shebanova 2002		27	0.69	9	0.02	23	0.07	26	0.22	51	0.06	23	0.11
Smith 1975		26	0.69	33	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	60	0.05	42	0.05
Sztompka 1959		13	0.72	11	0.02	28	0.07	27	0.17	38	0.07	22	0.11
Tanyel 1992		37	0.67	43	0.00	41	0.07	36	0.07	31	0.16	24	0.11
Tsujii 2005		3	0.75	45	0.00	9	0.06	10	0.39	48	0.04	20	0.12
Uninsky 1959		25	0.69	54	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.13	59	0.04	33	0.07
Vardi 1988		46	0.62	17	0.01	44	0.05	53	0.05	50	0.05	43	0.05
Wasowski 1980		53	0.59	18	0.01	54	0.04	56	0.04	60	0.04	53	0.04
Zimerman 1975		36	0.67	23	0.00	45	0.05	51	0.05	47	0.05	48	0.05
Random 1		66	-0.01	64	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	29	0.13	60	0.04
Random 2		65	0.01	58	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	20	0.24	35	0.07
Random 3		64	0.05	66	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	44	0.04	64	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).