Rubinstein 1952

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   55  0.637  0.0257  0.0550  0.0545  0.0556  0.05
Ashkenazy 1981   3  0.798  0.023  0.243  0.6827  0.403  0.52
Beliavsky 2004   58  0.6048  0.0058  0.0457  0.0460  0.0364  0.03
BenOr 1989   5  0.7710  0.017  0.176  0.5332  0.1812  0.31
Biret 1990   6  0.766  0.024  0.155  0.5928  0.275  0.40
Blet 2003   51  0.6518  0.0026  0.0827  0.1929  0.1523  0.17
Block 1995   46  0.6633  0.0046  0.0555  0.0545  0.0557  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   44  0.6734  0.0038  0.0544  0.0525  0.2335  0.11
Chiu 1999   42  0.6755  0.0044  0.0553  0.0539  0.0745  0.06
Clidat 1994   41  0.6745  0.0050  0.0556  0.0538  0.0655  0.05
Cohen 1997   52  0.6542  0.0052  0.0458  0.0434  0.0849  0.06
Coop 1987   36  0.6854  0.0048  0.0461  0.0456  0.0561  0.04
Cortot 1951   24  0.7160  0.0021  0.0720  0.3324  0.2314  0.28
Czerny 1949   31  0.6956  0.0035  0.0735  0.0737  0.1041  0.08
Czerny 1949b   14  0.733  0.0513  0.1319  0.3522  0.338  0.34
Ezaki 2006   22  0.7125  0.0033  0.0734  0.0749  0.0644  0.06
Falvay 1989   50  0.6653  0.0053  0.0551  0.0555  0.0460  0.04
Ferenczy 1958   49  0.6629  0.0047  0.0641  0.0619  0.3032  0.13
Fiorentino 1962   26  0.6924  0.0024  0.1218  0.3540  0.0727  0.16
Fliere 1977   13  0.7315  0.0112  0.1410  0.4429  0.2310  0.32
Fou 1978   19  0.7119  0.0022  0.0713  0.4136  0.0920  0.19
Francois 1956   63  0.4457  0.0063  0.0642  0.0637  0.0843  0.07
Hatto 1997   32  0.6865  0.0045  0.0545  0.0533  0.0942  0.07
Horowitz 1971   34  0.6826  0.0030  0.0632  0.1217  0.3121  0.19
Horowitz 1985   60  0.5522  0.0059  0.0460  0.0443  0.0751  0.05
Indjic 2001   21  0.7164  0.0031  0.0630  0.1435  0.0837  0.11
Kapell 1951   18  0.7252  0.0014  0.0917  0.3641  0.0725  0.16
Kiepura 1999   23  0.7113  0.0143  0.0736  0.0715  0.4222  0.17
Kilenyi 1937   38  0.6739  0.0040  0.0637  0.0636  0.1040  0.08
Kissin 1993   17  0.7236  0.0011  0.1211  0.4330  0.1316  0.24
Kitain 1937   62  0.4959  0.0062  0.0546  0.0539  0.0750  0.06
Kushner 1990   54  0.6411  0.0151  0.0549  0.0514  0.4328  0.15
Levy 1951   43  0.6735  0.0041  0.0547  0.0540  0.0746  0.06
Luisada 1990   8  0.754  0.0410  0.1412  0.4323  0.424  0.42
Lushtak 2004   39  0.6712  0.0137  0.0639  0.0625  0.2734  0.13
Lympany 1968   47  0.6628  0.0025  0.1026  0.2216  0.4113  0.30
Magaloff 1977   16  0.7244  0.0028  0.1222  0.2838  0.0730  0.14
Magaloff 1977b   20  0.7137  0.0027  0.0725  0.2633  0.0929  0.15
Magin 1975   37  0.6841  0.0054  0.0543  0.0551  0.0552  0.05
Milkina 1970   7  0.769  0.018  0.178  0.515  0.552  0.53
Mohovich 1999   12  0.7340  0.0020  0.0615  0.3834  0.0824  0.17
Nadelmann 1956   45  0.6743  0.0015  0.0724  0.2628  0.1718  0.21
Ohlsson 1999   33  0.6830  0.0042  0.0554  0.0542  0.0654  0.05
Olejniczac 1990   25  0.7050  0.0023  0.0816  0.3651  0.0533  0.13
Olejniczak 1991   40  0.6749  0.0036  0.0640  0.0647  0.0647  0.06
Osinska 1989   4  0.7717  0.016  0.154  0.5930  0.207  0.34
Paderewski 1912   35  0.6838  0.0034  0.0833  0.0825  0.3226  0.16
Perahia 1994   56  0.6232  0.0049  0.0552  0.0543  0.0558  0.05
Perlemuter 1986   59  0.5723  0.0061  0.0462  0.0433  0.1048  0.06
Poblocka 1999   10  0.7416  0.0118  0.0621  0.3051  0.0631  0.13
Rangell 2001   27  0.6927  0.0029  0.0629  0.1638  0.0838  0.11
Risler 1920   61  0.5358  0.0060  0.0363  0.0349  0.0659  0.04
Rosen 1989   29  0.6946  0.0017  0.0728  0.185  0.5511  0.31
Rubinstein 1939   28  0.6921  0.0016  0.0723  0.288  0.536  0.39
Rubinstein 1952   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Rubinstein 1966   2  0.832  0.302  0.512  0.733  0.771  0.75
Rummel 1943   30  0.6961  0.0039  0.0638  0.0625  0.2136  0.11
Shebanova 2002   53  0.6520  0.0055  0.0459  0.0444  0.0563  0.04
Smith 1975   15  0.7231  0.009  0.137  0.5234  0.1115  0.24
Szpilman 1948   48  0.6647  0.0032  0.0631  0.1236  0.0739  0.09
Uninsky 1971   57  0.6214  0.0156  0.0548  0.0563  0.0362  0.04
Wasowski 1980   11  0.7451  0.0019  0.0614  0.4034  0.0919  0.19
Weissenberg 1971   9  0.745  0.035  0.159  0.4630  0.249  0.33
Average   1  0.831  0.401  0.391  0.7940  0.0617  0.22
Random 1    65  -0.0166  0.0064  0.0264  0.0232  0.1353  0.05
Random 2   64  0.0063  0.0065  0.0265  0.0261  0.0265  0.02
Random 3   66  -0.0262  0.0066  0.0166  0.0161  0.0366  0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).