Levy 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		42	0.68	16	0.00	42	0.05	52	0.05	20	0.28	46	0.12
Ashkenazy 1981		4	0.80	14	0.00	12	0.17	9	0.58	14	0.50	15	0.54
Beliavsky 2004		29	0.73	18	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.18	3	0.54	27	0.31
BenOr 1989		17	0.76	36	0.00	19	0.09	15	0.47	23	0.41	18	0.44
Biret 1990		6	0.79	6	0.01	3	0.17	6	0.66	17	0.46	13	0.55
Blet 2003		44	0.67	15	0.00	53	0.06	43	0.06	26	0.19	47	0.11
Block 1995		20	0.76	20	0.00	28	0.08	29	0.20	14	0.42	29	0.29
Brailowsky 1960		47	0.66	42	0.00	52	0.04	57	0.04	29	0.21	50	0.09
Chiu 1999		28	0.73	29	0.00	30	0.08	30	0.20	28	0.36	31	0.27
Clidat 1994		48	0.66	54	0.00	45	0.06	46	0.06	30	0.12	55	0.08
Cohen 1997		59	0.60	52	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	53	0.04	65	0.04
Coop 1987		9	0.78	4	0.01	8	0.12	10	0.54	17	0.49	16	0.51
Cortot 1951		16	0.76	30	0.00	17	0.09	14	0.49	3	0.64	12	0.56
Czerny 1949		32	0.72	53	0.00	32	0.07	33	0.14	20	0.34	32	0.22
Czerny 1949b		21	0.75	12	0.01	11	0.13	21	0.45	3	0.71	10	0.57
Ezaki 2006		30	0.73	38	0.00	29	0.09	28	0.26	27	0.31	30	0.28
Falvay 1989		24	0.75	28	0.00	27	0.10	26	0.33	23	0.39	25	0.36
Ferenczy 1958		49	0.66	10	0.01	47	0.05	47	0.05	10	0.48	40	0.15
Fiorentino 1962		18	0.76	43	0.00	22	0.12	18	0.46	22	0.37	20	0.41
Fliere 1977		2	0.81	2	0.09	2	0.25	2	0.68	4	0.75	1	0.71
Fou 1978		8	0.78	3	0.02	4	0.17	4	0.67	3	0.67	3	0.67
Francois 1956		63	0.51	19	0.00	62	0.04	58	0.04	15	0.50	42	0.14
Hatto 1997		13	0.78	31	0.00	10	0.12	19	0.45	4	0.70	11	0.56
Horowitz 1971		54	0.63	55	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	34	0.08	58	0.06
Horowitz 1985		56	0.61	39	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	4	0.49	37	0.16
Indjic 2001		10	0.78	22	0.00	9	0.12	12	0.54	3	0.67	6	0.60
Kapell 1951		15	0.76	50	0.00	20	0.11	17	0.46	25	0.34	21	0.40
Kiepura 1999		57	0.61	58	0.00	61	0.05	54	0.05	49	0.05	60	0.05
Kilenyi 1937		27	0.74	27	0.00	24	0.10	25	0.36	26	0.45	22	0.40
Kissin 1993		23	0.75	45	0.00	21	0.11	20	0.45	22	0.33	23	0.39
Kitain 1937		62	0.52	49	0.00	63	0.06	45	0.06	43	0.06	57	0.06
Kushner 1990		61	0.59	61	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	42	0.06	62	0.05
Levy 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Luisada 1990		33	0.72	56	0.00	34	0.09	35	0.09	26	0.34	36	0.17
Lushtak 2004		40	0.69	23	0.00	44	0.06	42	0.06	15	0.41	39	0.16
Lympany 1968		60	0.60	63	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	51	0.04	64	0.04
Magaloff 1977		11	0.78	17	0.00	13	0.23	7	0.66	9	0.57	5	0.61
Magaloff 1977b		14	0.77	11	0.01	14	0.20	8	0.62	8	0.58	7	0.60
Magin 1975		41	0.68	62	0.00	43	0.06	44	0.06	32	0.18	48	0.10
Milkina 1970		43	0.68	35	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	49	0.05	61	0.05
Mohovich 1999		36	0.70	65	0.00	39	0.07	39	0.07	35	0.06	56	0.06
Nadelmann 1956		38	0.69	46	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.07	23	0.25	43	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		31	0.72	24	0.00	33	0.08	36	0.08	5	0.57	35	0.21
Olejniczac 1990		22	0.75	59	0.00	23	0.13	22	0.44	27	0.31	24	0.37
Olejniczak 1991		37	0.69	48	0.00	36	0.15	32	0.15	28	0.30	34	0.21
Osinska 1989		19	0.76	32	0.00	25	0.14	23	0.41	25	0.29	26	0.34
Paderewski 1912		34	0.71	5	0.01	15	0.12	24	0.38	4	0.63	17	0.49
Perahia 1994		58	0.60	51	0.00	54	0.04	59	0.04	34	0.06	63	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		52	0.65	33	0.00	55	0.04	62	0.04	21	0.37	44	0.12
Poblocka 1999		7	0.79	25	0.00	5	0.16	5	0.66	18	0.49	9	0.57
Rangell 2001		35	0.70	60	0.00	35	0.11	34	0.11	31	0.21	41	0.15
Risler 1920		51	0.66	37	0.00	37	0.08	37	0.08	2	0.55	33	0.21
Rosen 1989		53	0.65	40	0.00	57	0.05	51	0.05	28	0.19	49	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		46	0.67	9	0.01	48	0.07	41	0.07	12	0.38	38	0.16
Rubinstein 1952		45	0.67	26	0.00	51	0.07	40	0.07	47	0.05	59	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.66	47	0.00	50	0.05	49	0.05	31	0.16	51	0.09
Rummel 1943		55	0.62	8	0.01	40	0.05	50	0.05	30	0.15	53	0.09
Shebanova 2002		39	0.69	34	0.00	41	0.05	55	0.05	19	0.29	45	0.12
Smith 1975		3	0.80	21	0.00	6	0.25	3	0.67	4	0.65	4	0.66
Szpilman 1948		25	0.75	44	0.00	16	0.14	13	0.50	5	0.59	14	0.54
Uninsky 1971		26	0.74	7	0.01	26	0.11	27	0.28	23	0.35	28	0.31
Wasowski 1980		5	0.79	13	0.01	7	0.24	11	0.54	7	0.64	8	0.59
Weissenberg 1971		12	0.78	41	0.00	18	0.09	16	0.46	23	0.37	19	0.41
Average		1	0.86	1	0.75	1	0.74	1	0.89	14	0.54	2	0.69
Random 1		66	-0.03	64	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	49	0.04	66	0.02
Random 2		64	0.03	66	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	15	0.26	52	0.09
Random 3		65	0.01	57	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	13	0.43	54	0.09

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).