Falvay 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		23	0.76	31	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.06	6	0.57	31	0.18
Ashkenazy 1981		13	0.78	4	0.02	10	0.10	15	0.47	32	0.17	26	0.28
Beliavsky 2004		38	0.72	9	0.01	27	0.08	26	0.23	5	0.50	18	0.34
BenOr 1989		4	0.80	33	0.00	5	0.13	4	0.63	20	0.44	7	0.53
Biret 1990		8	0.79	51	0.00	15	0.11	14	0.49	31	0.21	22	0.32
Blet 2003		6	0.80	8	0.01	3	0.17	3	0.65	2	0.75	2	0.70
Block 1995		15	0.78	21	0.00	25	0.13	25	0.28	15	0.41	19	0.34
Brailowsky 1960		32	0.74	35	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.17	7	0.56	23	0.31
Chiu 1999		2	0.81	2	0.14	2	0.43	2	0.73	2	0.74	1	0.73
Clidat 1994		18	0.77	53	0.00	24	0.13	22	0.41	3	0.71	6	0.54
Cohen 1997		27	0.75	52	0.00	42	0.08	35	0.08	4	0.58	30	0.22
Coop 1987		14	0.78	22	0.00	12	0.10	7	0.57	21	0.45	8	0.51
Cortot 1951		9	0.79	30	0.00	21	0.11	16	0.45	16	0.45	13	0.45
Czerny 1949		36	0.73	25	0.00	44	0.11	33	0.11	32	0.13	43	0.12
Czerny 1949b		54	0.64	28	0.00	47	0.05	48	0.05	43	0.07	53	0.06
Ezaki 2006		7	0.79	7	0.01	16	0.12	18	0.44	24	0.41	16	0.42
Falvay 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ferenczy 1958		59	0.57	41	0.00	63	0.05	47	0.05	59	0.04	62	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		17	0.77	65	0.00	14	0.11	12	0.51	31	0.23	20	0.34
Fliere 1977		16	0.78	10	0.01	17	0.09	8	0.54	12	0.55	5	0.54
Fou 1978		42	0.71	45	0.00	36	0.06	42	0.06	39	0.08	48	0.07
Francois 1956		58	0.58	37	0.00	51	0.04	59	0.04	3	0.74	35	0.17
Hatto 1997		12	0.78	16	0.00	11	0.10	13	0.49	5	0.64	4	0.56
Horowitz 1971		56	0.61	47	0.00	56	0.04	62	0.04	41	0.07	60	0.05
Horowitz 1985		60	0.56	48	0.00	52	0.04	61	0.04	33	0.09	51	0.06
Indjic 2001		10	0.79	39	0.00	22	0.10	17	0.45	12	0.46	12	0.45
Kapell 1951		19	0.77	6	0.02	23	0.11	20	0.42	31	0.21	24	0.30
Kiepura 1999		45	0.69	24	0.00	45	0.05	53	0.05	20	0.37	39	0.14
Kilenyi 1937		44	0.69	42	0.00	34	0.06	40	0.06	33	0.11	47	0.08
Kissin 1993		29	0.75	55	0.00	19	0.14	21	0.42	46	0.05	41	0.14
Kitain 1937		63	0.53	36	0.00	62	0.05	54	0.05	30	0.18	45	0.09
Kushner 1990		52	0.64	43	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	30	0.17	46	0.08
Levy 1951		28	0.75	20	0.00	18	0.10	23	0.39	26	0.33	17	0.36
Luisada 1990		24	0.75	19	0.00	43	0.08	34	0.08	39	0.07	49	0.07
Lushtak 2004		37	0.72	11	0.01	37	0.06	44	0.06	10	0.49	34	0.17
Lympany 1968		39	0.72	63	0.00	40	0.07	38	0.07	15	0.42	32	0.17
Magaloff 1977		41	0.71	44	0.00	28	0.07	28	0.19	42	0.07	44	0.12
Magaloff 1977b		40	0.71	14	0.00	29	0.08	29	0.18	32	0.14	37	0.16
Magin 1975		20	0.76	18	0.00	35	0.06	43	0.06	31	0.34	40	0.14
Milkina 1970		33	0.74	3	0.04	31	0.06	32	0.14	9	0.45	27	0.25
Mohovich 1999		21	0.76	38	0.00	20	0.11	19	0.43	17	0.43	15	0.43
Nadelmann 1956		35	0.73	29	0.00	32	0.08	31	0.15	16	0.37	28	0.24
Ohlsson 1999		53	0.64	60	0.00	59	0.04	56	0.04	44	0.05	61	0.04
Olejniczac 1990		11	0.79	66	0.00	9	0.10	10	0.54	32	0.20	21	0.33
Olejniczak 1991		34	0.74	13	0.01	13	0.10	24	0.33	30	0.25	25	0.29
Osinska 1989		5	0.80	12	0.01	6	0.13	5	0.62	24	0.33	11	0.45
Paderewski 1912		62	0.53	57	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	59	0.04	63	0.04
Perahia 1994		48	0.66	17	0.00	38	0.07	36	0.07	10	0.38	36	0.16
Perlemuter 1986		43	0.69	26	0.00	46	0.05	46	0.05	6	0.57	33	0.17
Poblocka 1999		3	0.81	23	0.00	4	0.16	6	0.60	28	0.31	14	0.43
Rangell 2001		26	0.75	61	0.00	26	0.08	27	0.20	29	0.27	29	0.23
Risler 1920		61	0.55	46	0.00	60	0.05	52	0.05	47	0.06	56	0.05
Rosen 1989		47	0.67	49	0.00	50	0.05	45	0.05	13	0.45	38	0.15
Rubinstein 1939		55	0.63	15	0.00	53	0.05	50	0.05	33	0.08	52	0.06
Rubinstein 1952		49	0.66	32	0.00	54	0.04	55	0.04	51	0.05	65	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		50	0.65	50	0.00	55	0.04	63	0.04	37	0.06	57	0.05
Rummel 1943		57	0.59	58	0.00	57	0.04	57	0.04	51	0.05	64	0.04
Shebanova 2002		46	0.69	34	0.00	49	0.06	41	0.06	42	0.05	58	0.05
Smith 1975		22	0.76	27	0.00	8	0.12	9	0.54	16	0.40	10	0.46
Szpilman 1948		51	0.65	59	0.00	48	0.05	49	0.05	50	0.05	55	0.05
Uninsky 1971		31	0.74	5	0.02	7	0.12	11	0.53	11	0.49	9	0.51
Wasowski 1980		25	0.75	54	0.00	33	0.05	51	0.05	37	0.08	50	0.06
Weissenberg 1971		30	0.74	40	0.00	41	0.07	37	0.07	54	0.05	54	0.06
Average		1	0.87	1	0.66	1	0.65	1	0.89	24	0.40	3	0.60
Random 1		64	0.03	64	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	4	0.57	42	0.13
Random 2		65	0.01	62	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	48	0.03	66	0.02
Random 3		66	0.01	56	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	19	0.29	59	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).