Ezaki 2006

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		40	0.72	33	0.00	48	0.10	34	0.10	34	0.06	43	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		13	0.82	27	0.00	14	0.13	8	0.61	18	0.47	12	0.54
Beliavsky 2004		38	0.72	49	0.00	39	0.06	50	0.06	23	0.24	39	0.12
BenOr 1989		16	0.80	15	0.01	25	0.13	25	0.41	29	0.26	28	0.33
Biret 1990		3	0.87	4	0.08	3	0.17	4	0.73	5	0.67	2	0.70
Blet 2003		50	0.66	60	0.00	51	0.09	35	0.09	52	0.05	47	0.07
Block 1995		29	0.75	43	0.00	38	0.06	51	0.06	28	0.26	41	0.12
Brailowsky 1960		54	0.62	56	0.00	55	0.05	58	0.05	57	0.04	59	0.04
Chiu 1999		18	0.79	12	0.01	17	0.11	16	0.51	13	0.50	17	0.50
Clidat 1994		35	0.73	17	0.00	43	0.11	33	0.11	20	0.32	34	0.19
Cohen 1997		34	0.73	51	0.00	46	0.07	46	0.07	13	0.33	37	0.15
Coop 1987		8	0.85	11	0.02	7	0.24	5	0.67	5	0.64	5	0.65
Cortot 1951		30	0.75	48	0.00	35	0.07	45	0.07	22	0.27	38	0.14
Czerny 1949		20	0.78	21	0.00	21	0.13	20	0.46	13	0.58	13	0.52
Czerny 1949b		45	0.69	38	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.23	23	0.31	31	0.27
Ezaki 2006		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Falvay 1989		17	0.79	6	0.04	24	0.10	24	0.41	18	0.44	21	0.42
Ferenczy 1958		56	0.58	54	0.00	57	0.03	63	0.03	62	0.03	64	0.03
Fiorentino 1962		26	0.76	50	0.00	19	0.11	22	0.44	25	0.33	23	0.38
Fliere 1977		41	0.71	47	0.00	44	0.08	44	0.08	34	0.07	45	0.07
Fou 1978		21	0.78	23	0.00	20	0.12	21	0.45	17	0.43	19	0.44
Francois 1956		63	0.40	37	0.00	63	0.06	54	0.06	58	0.04	56	0.05
Hatto 1997		31	0.74	39	0.00	42	0.08	40	0.08	23	0.28	36	0.15
Horowitz 1971		58	0.57	40	0.00	59	0.05	59	0.05	56	0.05	55	0.05
Horowitz 1985		61	0.51	44	0.00	60	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04	58	0.04
Indjic 2001		24	0.77	25	0.00	37	0.06	52	0.06	31	0.15	42	0.09
Kapell 1951		14	0.81	13	0.01	12	0.25	13	0.54	8	0.48	15	0.51
Kiepura 1999		43	0.70	42	0.00	49	0.08	42	0.08	35	0.06	44	0.07
Kilenyi 1937		22	0.77	35	0.00	13	0.14	18	0.47	21	0.50	18	0.48
Kissin 1993		23	0.77	34	0.00	22	0.13	23	0.42	23	0.29	25	0.35
Kitain 1937		62	0.45	28	0.00	62	0.06	53	0.06	46	0.06	52	0.06
Kushner 1990		32	0.74	19	0.00	33	0.08	41	0.08	1	0.77	33	0.25
Levy 1951		37	0.73	41	0.00	28	0.11	27	0.31	28	0.26	30	0.28
Luisada 1990		5	0.86	3	0.09	6	0.23	6	0.66	3	0.71	3	0.68
Lushtak 2004		36	0.73	8	0.02	26	0.10	32	0.18	8	0.61	27	0.33
Lympany 1968		51	0.64	63	0.00	52	0.05	57	0.05	59	0.04	57	0.04
Magaloff 1977		10	0.82	55	0.00	10	0.21	14	0.52	13	0.52	14	0.52
Magaloff 1977b		12	0.82	31	0.00	11	0.19	15	0.51	15	0.52	16	0.51
Magin 1975		11	0.82	9	0.02	15	0.15	11	0.57	15	0.54	10	0.55
Milkina 1970		48	0.67	46	0.00	53	0.05	56	0.05	55	0.04	62	0.04
Mohovich 1999		25	0.76	45	0.00	31	0.10	28	0.25	25	0.28	32	0.26
Nadelmann 1956		39	0.72	52	0.00	41	0.09	36	0.09	29	0.17	40	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		46	0.68	18	0.00	45	0.08	43	0.08	43	0.06	46	0.07
Olejniczac 1990		19	0.79	61	0.00	16	0.21	17	0.49	21	0.40	20	0.44
Olejniczak 1991		9	0.84	7	0.03	8	0.22	9	0.60	9	0.55	7	0.57
Osinska 1989		6	0.86	2	0.15	2	0.17	1	0.81	3	0.70	1	0.75
Paderewski 1912		53	0.62	66	0.00	47	0.08	38	0.08	45	0.05	49	0.06
Perahia 1994		55	0.60	16	0.00	36	0.07	47	0.07	48	0.05	50	0.06
Perlemuter 1986		59	0.57	36	0.00	61	0.04	60	0.04	62	0.04	63	0.04
Poblocka 1999		2	0.88	10	0.02	5	0.20	7	0.62	9	0.56	6	0.59
Rangell 2001		7	0.85	32	0.00	9	0.35	12	0.57	9	0.57	9	0.57
Risler 1920		49	0.66	26	0.00	32	0.10	31	0.19	12	0.47	29	0.30
Rosen 1989		52	0.64	30	0.00	54	0.07	48	0.07	53	0.05	51	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		60	0.54	64	0.00	58	0.03	62	0.03	52	0.05	60	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		42	0.71	24	0.00	40	0.06	49	0.06	34	0.07	53	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		47	0.67	58	0.00	50	0.08	37	0.08	53	0.04	48	0.06
Rummel 1943		57	0.58	65	0.00	56	0.05	55	0.05	42	0.06	54	0.05
Shebanova 2002		27	0.76	14	0.01	29	0.10	30	0.23	5	0.60	24	0.37
Smith 1975		28	0.76	20	0.00	23	0.12	19	0.47	18	0.34	22	0.40
Szpilman 1948		44	0.70	53	0.00	34	0.08	39	0.08	24	0.31	35	0.16
Uninsky 1971		33	0.73	29	0.00	27	0.08	26	0.35	24	0.35	26	0.35
Wasowski 1980		15	0.80	22	0.00	18	0.14	10	0.59	14	0.50	11	0.54
Weissenberg 1971		4	0.87	1	0.37	1	0.36	3	0.74	6	0.60	4	0.67
Average		1	0.88	5	0.07	4	0.22	2	0.79	21	0.41	8	0.57
Random 1		65	0.00	62	0.00	65	0.03	64	0.03	35	0.05	61	0.04
Random 2		64	0.00	57	0.00	64	0.03	65	0.03	38	0.04	65	0.03
Random 3		66	-0.06	59	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	63	0.02	66	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).