Average

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		40	0.81	21	0.01	47	0.05	52	0.05	1	0.89	47	0.21
Ashkenazy 1981		6	0.90	6	0.06	7	0.17	6	0.65	1	0.89	7	0.76
Beliavsky 2004		41	0.81	48	0.00	40	0.05	48	0.05	1	0.68	58	0.18
BenOr 1989		2	0.92	2	0.13	2	0.16	1	0.72	1	0.93	1	0.82
Biret 1990		3	0.91	1	0.26	1	0.25	3	0.69	1	0.90	2	0.79
Blet 2003		38	0.82	18	0.01	36	0.06	37	0.06	1	0.88	38	0.23
Block 1995		26	0.86	11	0.02	28	0.10	28	0.22	1	0.84	28	0.43
Brailowsky 1960		48	0.79	50	0.00	48	0.06	45	0.06	1	0.83	40	0.22
Chiu 1999		28	0.86	40	0.00	25	0.12	25	0.38	1	0.83	24	0.56
Clidat 1994		39	0.81	36	0.00	42	0.08	35	0.08	1	0.76	35	0.25
Cohen 1997		49	0.79	63	0.00	51	0.03	63	0.03	1	0.77	63	0.15
Coop 1987		16	0.87	60	0.00	23	0.11	23	0.41	1	0.82	21	0.58
Cortot 1951		29	0.85	59	0.00	31	0.09	29	0.20	1	0.88	29	0.42
Czerny 1949		33	0.84	53	0.00	34	0.10	33	0.10	1	0.72	33	0.27
Czerny 1949b		46	0.80	61	0.00	37	0.05	53	0.05	1	0.76	54	0.19
Ezaki 2006		9	0.88	55	0.00	21	0.09	21	0.41	2	0.79	23	0.57
Falvay 1989		17	0.87	15	0.01	26	0.16	24	0.40	1	0.89	18	0.60
Ferenczy 1958		56	0.75	30	0.00	56	0.04	62	0.04	1	0.81	59	0.18
Fiorentino 1962		12	0.88	12	0.02	9	0.20	8	0.62	2	0.87	10	0.73
Fliere 1977		15	0.87	17	0.01	22	0.09	17	0.47	1	0.89	15	0.65
Fou 1978		27	0.86	49	0.00	17	0.12	19	0.44	1	0.81	19	0.60
Francois 1956		63	0.57	37	0.00	63	0.06	41	0.06	1	0.79	45	0.22
Hatto 1997		32	0.84	32	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.06	2	0.84	42	0.22
Horowitz 1971		54	0.76	35	0.00	53	0.04	60	0.04	1	0.83	60	0.18
Horowitz 1985		61	0.68	29	0.00	58	0.04	58	0.04	2	0.76	61	0.17
Indjic 2001		21	0.87	28	0.00	30	0.07	30	0.18	2	0.87	30	0.40
Kapell 1951		10	0.88	45	0.00	15	0.15	15	0.52	1	0.77	16	0.63
Kiepura 1999		45	0.80	31	0.00	52	0.04	61	0.04	1	0.81	56	0.18
Kilenyi 1937		30	0.85	44	0.00	18	0.09	20	0.43	1	0.78	22	0.58
Kissin 1993		11	0.88	13	0.02	6	0.20	11	0.60	1	0.87	11	0.72
Kitain 1937		62	0.62	51	0.00	62	0.06	43	0.06	1	0.74	49	0.21
Kushner 1990		57	0.74	58	0.00	60	0.05	50	0.05	2	0.73	55	0.19
Levy 1951		23	0.86	7	0.05	12	0.12	14	0.54	1	0.89	14	0.69
Luisada 1990		20	0.87	23	0.00	27	0.10	27	0.25	2	0.76	27	0.44
Lushtak 2004		47	0.80	34	0.00	50	0.05	51	0.05	1	0.84	51	0.20
Lympany 1968		50	0.78	42	0.00	49	0.06	42	0.06	1	0.81	39	0.22
Magaloff 1977		13	0.87	33	0.00	14	0.17	12	0.56	2	0.88	12	0.70
Magaloff 1977b		18	0.87	22	0.00	16	0.17	13	0.55	2	0.88	13	0.70
Magin 1975		19	0.87	43	0.00	32	0.09	31	0.17	1	0.73	32	0.35
Milkina 1970		35	0.83	10	0.02	43	0.06	36	0.06	1	0.85	36	0.23
Mohovich 1999		22	0.87	27	0.00	20	0.10	22	0.41	1	0.89	20	0.60
Nadelmann 1956		36	0.82	57	0.00	29	0.07	32	0.16	1	0.84	31	0.37
Ohlsson 1999		44	0.80	47	0.00	41	0.06	47	0.06	1	0.77	46	0.21
Olejniczac 1990		7	0.89	3	0.12	3	0.17	5	0.67	2	0.86	6	0.76
Olejniczak 1991		25	0.86	52	0.00	19	0.13	18	0.44	2	0.70	25	0.55
Osinska 1989		5	0.90	14	0.01	8	0.17	10	0.61	1	0.87	9	0.73
Paderewski 1912		51	0.77	56	0.00	38	0.05	54	0.05	1	0.80	50	0.20
Perahia 1994		58	0.74	41	0.00	57	0.05	56	0.05	1	0.78	53	0.20
Perlemuter 1986		59	0.72	24	0.00	61	0.06	44	0.06	1	0.86	37	0.23
Poblocka 1999		1	0.92	4	0.07	4	0.19	4	0.68	1	0.87	3	0.77
Rangell 2001		24	0.86	62	0.00	24	0.11	26	0.38	1	0.75	26	0.53
Risler 1920		60	0.69	46	0.00	55	0.04	59	0.04	1	0.59	62	0.15
Rosen 1989		52	0.77	20	0.01	59	0.05	55	0.05	1	0.85	48	0.21
Rubinstein 1939		55	0.75	25	0.00	54	0.04	57	0.04	1	0.81	57	0.18
Rubinstein 1952		34	0.83	26	0.00	35	0.06	40	0.06	1	0.79	44	0.22
Rubinstein 1966		37	0.82	39	0.00	44	0.06	38	0.06	2	0.78	41	0.22
Rummel 1943		53	0.76	54	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	1	0.82	52	0.20
Shebanova 2002		43	0.81	19	0.01	45	0.06	46	0.06	1	0.81	43	0.22
Smith 1975		14	0.87	9	0.03	10	0.24	7	0.64	1	0.90	5	0.76
Szpilman 1948		42	0.81	38	0.00	33	0.09	34	0.09	2	0.78	34	0.26
Uninsky 1971		31	0.85	16	0.01	13	0.11	16	0.48	1	0.82	17	0.63
Wasowski 1980		8	0.89	8	0.04	11	0.21	9	0.62	1	0.89	8	0.74
Weissenberg 1971		4	0.91	5	0.07	5	0.23	2	0.70	1	0.85	4	0.77
Average		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 1		65	-0.01	64	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	43	0.04	65	0.03
Random 2		64	0.01	65	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	33	0.05	64	0.04
Random 3		66	-0.01	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	50	0.04	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).